Using the derivative preposition “despite that”: rules, examples. Prepositions that are always used incorrectly Prepositions to and to use

Why are you right when you are unhappy after hearing or reading someone’s “I’m back from the store”, “I can’t say anything about this film, I haven’t seen it”? We analyze difficult cases of using simple prepositions, taking into account the advice of the Gramota.ru portal.

To a doctor or to a doctor?

Despite the two consonants in a row in the word “doctor,” it is correct to write and say “to the doctor.” “to” is required only in a number of cases:

– before the words “lion”, “ice”, “flax”, “forehead”, “lie”, “moss”, “ditch”, “rye”, “mouth”, “whole”, “every”, “every” , “Tuesday”, “second”, “many” in the dative case: to the forehead, to the lion, to every holiday;

– before the word “me”: come to me;

– before the words “yesterday”, “seam” you can use both the preposition “to” and the preposition “to”: let’s turn to/to yesterday’s news.

BUT! In some cases (in fiction, in journalism), to add pathos and solemnity to the speech, it is possible to replace the preposition “to” with “to”: to the universal tragedy.

ABOUT the book or ABOUT the book?

Both options are possible, but the preposition “about” is a sign of a conversational style, casual speech, while the phrase with “about” is stylistically neutral and impeccably correct.

In Ukraine or IN Ukraine?

This is one of the most popular questions for specialists of the Gramota.ru portal. Their answer: the literary norm of the modern Russian language is “in Ukraine”, “from Ukraine”. And no politics, only the traditions of the great and mighty, which have developed over centuries.

Control FOR or control OVER?

Both prepositions can be used in pairs with nouns that are formed from verbs: control over / over the expenditure of profit. Subtleties: if a noun denotes an action, process or characteristic, it is better to choose the preposition “for” (monitoring the independent work of students, monitoring the execution of the director’s order). And if this is an abstract concept or an animate object, the scales tip in favor of “over” (control over interns, control over the business).

Worry FOR or worry ABOUT?

There is no need to worry about your own literacy or think badly about it: both options have a right to exist. Previously, however, the construction “to worry about something or someone” was considered colloquial.

About everyone, ABOUT everyone or ABOUT everyone?

Correct answer: about everyone. When are the prepositions “about”, “about” and about” needed?

– in the accusative case, before words that begin with consonants (except for the words “everything”, “all”, “all”, “everyone”, “what”), we write and pronounce the prepositions “o” / “about”: hit about / about water;

– in the accusative case, before words that begin with vowels, the preposition “about” is needed: about the university, about apricot jam;

– in the accusative case, before the words “all”, “all”, “everyone”, “all”, “what”, “anything”, “anything”, “something” we put the preposition “about”: stuttered about something in the dark;

– in the prepositional case, before words that begin with consonants (except for the words “me”, “everyone”, “everyone”, “everyone”), the preposition “o” is required: sang about love;

– in the prepositional case, before words that begin with vowels, the preposition “about” is used: reminded me about the vacation;

– in the prepositional case, before the words “me”, “everyone”, “all”, “all”, the preposition “about” is needed: I guessed about all her tricks.

BUT! For words with “e”, “e”, “yu”, “ya” at the beginning (the case is no longer important) only the preposition “o” is suitable, since they “start” with the consonant sound “th” not in writing, but in pronunciation ": Christmas tree = yolka, so about the Christmas tree, about apples, about the lawyer.

FOR the book or ABOUT the book?

Which phrase seems more euphonious to you: “I’ll say about the new book: interesting” or “I’ll say about the new book: interesting”? You are right: using the preposition “for” instead of the preposition “about” is incorrect.

Is he from the store or is he from the store?

Let’s remember pairs of prepositions that complement each other like yin and yang: the preposition “of” is a partner of “in”, and the preposition “with” is a friend of “on”. That is, if someone goes to the store, they will return from the store, and not from it. And if someone is from the Urals, then they will go to the Urals to visit their parents (compare: “I’m from Siberia,” but “I’m going to Siberia”).

Since yesterday or FROM yesterday?

In this example, both options are equal. In general, the preposition “with” instead of “with” is necessary:

- before words that begin with “s/z/sh/zh + consonant” or with the consonant “sch”: from a schooner, with generosity;

– before the words “lion”, “ice”, “flax”, “forehead”, “moss”, “ditch”, “mouth” in the genitive and instrumental cases: from the forehead, with ice;

– with the words “me”, “me”;

– before the case forms of the words “louse”, “whole”, “everyone”, “every one”, “Tuesday”, “second”, “many”: from Tuesday, with everyone;

- in stable combinations: with taste, with attention, with time, from the yard, from day to day, from the bottom.

BETWEEN the trees or BETWEEN the trees?

Philologists know: to say “between what?” and “between what?” not a mistake. But the second option (between trees, between tables, between books) is considered obsolete.

At our own place or At our own place?

There is no need to repeat the preposition in such expressions; this is a feature of common speech.

In the Universe or IN the Universe?

Before words that begin with “v/f + consonant” (in the All-Russian competition, the need for fluoridation of water), you need to write and pronounce the preposition “in”. Otherwise, especially in oral speech, it is easy to stumble over an unpronounceable cluster of consonant sounds.

BY May 20 or BEFORE May 20?

So, you need to designate a time period for yourself or someone else and indicate its end date. It is generally accepted that in a date with the preposition “before” the previous day serves as the boundary: for example, until May 20 is May 19 as the deadline. And if it says “until May 20,” then you can complete the task on the 20th. But linguists emphasize: constructions with both prepositions do not reliably determine whether the reference date is included in the period it ends. And they advise adding the adverb “inclusive”: from May 10 to May 20 inclusive, from May 10 to May 20 inclusive.

By Monday or On Monday?

And again the subtleties of meaning. “By Monday” means something needs to be done on Sunday, before the next day starts. “On Monday” means that the work can be done during this day.

Statement by Petrova or statement FROM Petrova?

Both options when writing a document are equivalent: to use a preposition or not - the choice is yours.

Not only Rostov the Great and Rostov-on-Don can be used in this phrase, they say this everywhere about any cities and countries. " - Where are you from? “I’m from Rostov/Moscow/St. Petersburg/Stavropol/Novosibirsk.” It’s ignorant to answer like that!

Rule for quick memorization

The problem lies in the incorrect use of the preposition “with” instead of “from”. But how to properly distinguish them? Why is it okay to say “coming from a walk”, but “returning from Stavropol” would be a mistake?
Both prepositions have an antonymic pair: “with” - “on”, “from” - “in”. It is these prepositions that are opposite in meaning that will help you use “with” and “from” correctly. You must substitute a preposition-antonym into the phrase.

Examples of using the rule

We can say “I’ll go for a walk” and not “I’ll go for a walk”, which means we choose the opposite of the preposition “on” - “with” (“I’m going for a walk”).

Now let's try to check this pattern using the example of “I came from Rostov.” First we substitute the preposition “on”, which is the antonym of “with”. “I’ll come to Rostov”? It sounds absurd. The second option - “I will come to Rostov” is the only correct one. This means we choose the preposition “from”, the opposite of “on”.

“I’m going to a meeting” - “I’m returning from a meeting.”
“He went into the army” - “he returned from the army.”
“Next year I will go to Bali” - “I am returning from Bali.”
“I’m planning a trip to Tokyo” - “I bought a ticket from Tokyo yesterday.”
“Link to the Caucasus” - “he comes from the Caucasus.”

Learning Russian is not easy for everyone. It contains a variety of spelling norms, rules and exceptions. When writing the combination “despite that”, pay attention to what part of speech it is expressed. This can be a preposition or a homonymous gerund. It is important to understand in which cases the turnover is written separately, and in which together.

Derivative prepositions: rules in Russian

Prepositions in Russian are important. They indicate the dependence of nouns, pronouns and numerals on other words. This applies to sentences and phrases. A part of speech has no meaning of its own, so a preposition can only serve. When using it, it is important to know how to spell “despite that.” The correct use of a derived preposition involves various ways of placing it in a sentence.

Derivative prepositions are transferred from other parts of speech. At the same time, they lose their morphological characteristics: words are necessary to indicate dependence on other words, they cannot be declined by case, they do not have gender and number, they are not members of a sentence. When writing, take into account the rules of punctuation.

Spelling the combination “despite”

If you need to show that a person has given in, use the pretext “despite that.” Its synonyms are the words “despite”, “not taking into account”. You can determine the part of speech by making a substitution. Example: “Despite the fact that all the streets were covered with snow, the children were at every step.” Replace the preposition with the word “in spite of.” The result is a sentence: “Despite the snow that covered all the streets, the children were at every step.”

The test is carried out using a question. A preposition is a service part of speech, so a question cannot be asked. If after the question you can get an answer, then the word is another part of speech. To determine the writing rules, pay attention to the following points:

• The combined spelling with “not” indicates that the sentence contains a preposition: “Despite the fatigue, we quickly climbed to the top of the mountain.”
• Concessive meaning, when it can be replaced with the word “despite”: “Despite (despite) the offense, I spoke calmly.”
• The prefix “not” cannot be omitted. It is incorrect to use the word “depending on”.
• There is no replacement with another part of speech, for example, a verb.

The preposition “despite that” cannot be removed from the sentence, since its meaning is lost. If the prefix disappears during pronunciation, it will become unclear what the person wants to say. This can be seen in some sentences:

• They excitedly talked about their lives, despite the fact that they had not seen each other for ages. When changed to the word “looking” the meaning is lost.
• Vera decided to visit the establishment, despite the fact that she was sorely short of time.

The reverse is not always separated by commas. To place punctuation marks correctly, you need to pay attention to the placement of the preposition. It can appear at the beginning or end of a sentence, so it is separated by commas on one or both sides.

Punctuation under circumstances

Sentences often use adverbial members that contain derivative prepositions. Among them: thanks to, despite, as a result of, like. Isolation occurs to emphasize the meaning of what is being said. Example: “Despite the fact that there were many curious people on the street, the village seemed deserted and silent. He decided to go to training, despite the fact that the doctors forbade it.”

When using the preposition “despite the fact that,” a comma is not used if it comes immediately after the verb. Punctuation is only required before the word "what". Differences in punctuation depend on word order. Example: “He looked despite the fact that his eyes hurt a lot.”

Writing a derived preposition

The part of speech helps make the sentence colorful and indicates that the action was performed in spite of something. Among the features are the following writing rules:

1. Derivative prepositions consist of one or more words.
2. You need to remember the spelling, you can check it in a spelling dictionary.
3. When used, one preposition is replaced by another synonymous one.

The preposition “despite” is formed from the gerund. When writing, take into account the possibility of opposition. The particle “not” has become a prefix. Unlike the gerund, it is written together with a preposition. It is separated by commas, just like the participial phrase.

Prepositions. It is they, being a service part of speech, that act as a bunch of words in a sentence, which means that, although they cannot be used independently, they play an important role in the correct construction of phrases. Gluing, linking, linking, joining, joining words together and one part of a sentence with another - all these are prepositions; they create the semantic integrity of expressions, which without prepositions can simply fall apart into parts - into separate words, and it will be impossible to understand anything. These are like overtones in music - additional harmonious overtones that give the sound of any musical instrument or voice a specific timbre coloring. It is on this note, figuratively speaking, that we will try to stop. How we “sing”, what we hear, how we cement words with the help of prepositions and what “music” is produced.

We do not set ourselves the task of telling everything about prepositions, their varieties, functions, origin, etc. - there are textbooks and special literature for this. Let's look at just a few practical examples of the use of prepositions, because it is important for us to use them correctly in constructing sentences so that the “music” starts to sound, so as not to let the rooster crow at the highest notes, not to falsify and not worry later that instead of aesthetic pleasure (or achieving the goal that we put) listeners or readers, recipients will have completely different impressions, and we ourselves will find ourselves in an awkward position.

When observing literary norms, the use of so-called abstract prepositions after verbs causes particular difficulties. These are prepositions-adhesives, inextricably linked with certain verbs and being components of indecomposable phrases. Examples of incorrect use of such prepositions: “I’m surprised at you”, “Don’t rejoice over this situation”, “The director noted the achievements of his employees”, “Members of the board decided that...”, “The article indicates that...” , “You must pay for the services.” The list can be continued indefinitely; unfortunately, such “music” is not so rarely heard. Prepositions are always combined with nouns, pronouns, numerals and indicate their syntactic relationship to other words (verbs and other parts of speech), that is, they connect two words and refer to both of them at the same time. But prepositions may not be present in the sentence at all.

Let's look at the examples given.

I'm surprised - to whom? (to what?) (not why/who!) - to you: “I’m surprised at you.” The use of the phrase “off you” would be justified in the expression “I took off your coat.” Don't be happy - why? (to whom?) (not over anything/whom!): “Don’t be happy about this situation.” The use of the phrase “over this situation” is acceptable in the expression “I reasoned over this situation.”

The director noted - what? (nothing to talk about!) - achievements: “The director noted the achievements of his employees.” But: “The director spoke about the achievements of his employees.” The board members decided - what? (about nothing!). Variations are possible. For example: they decided to keep everyone on duty; it was decided that no one should leave; decided to postpone the resolution of the issue; decided: to recognize the work as satisfactory, etc.

The article indicates - what? or what? (not about anything!): “The article indicates that...” But: “The article states that...”. You have to pay - what? (you're welcome!): “You must pay for the services.” But: “You have to pay for the services.” As you can see, you need to maintain proper control, be able to conduct with words, i.e. in this case, you are the conductor and it depends on you how the music performed by the orchestra will sound, how your phrase will sound, how it will be perceived by those to whom it is addressed.

But with the most seemingly simple prepositions “in”, “with”, “on”, “from”, confusion also arises. To begin with, you should remember that these prepositions form an antonymous pair, i.e. if “in” - then “from”, if “on” - then “with”. For example: I am going to the store, respectively: I am leaving the store. I put the book on the table - I take the book from the table.

At the same time, the prepositions “in” and “on” can have the same meaning. For example: sit in the kitchen / in the kitchen; work in a company / company; fly on a plane / on a plane. In these cases, it is acceptable to use both prepositions.

But it is also possible for these prepositions to differ in meaning. For example: look into the water - that is, look at one point; and look at the water - that is, cover a large surface with your gaze. Or this interesting point: I came from school - I mean where from; I remember from school - I mean from my school years. The preposition “so” (“with”) is normatively used when indicating time.

There may be a difference in prepositions in terms of their consolidation in stable phrases. For example: live in a village; the first guy in the village. Difference in compatibility with certain words. For example: I was in Crimea, in Kazakhstan; I was in the Caucasus, Ukraine.

This compatibility is determined by traditional usage. Accordingly, it is correct: from Crimea, from Kazakhstan and from the Caucasus, from Ukraine. Therefore, in such cases, you just need to remember when which preposition should be used, or just look it up in the dictionary.

Special attention should be paid to when the letter “o” is added to the prepositions “in”, “to”, “with”, “under”, “without”, “from”, “above”, etc., i.e. when to use the preposition “to”, and when “to”, when “with”, and when “so”... In this case, you need to remember the rules. Let's list just a few of them.

The preposition “so” is natural in the following combinations: with a country, with a meaning, with a barbell, with a tourniquet, with cabbage soup, i.e. it is placed before words starting with the letters “s”, “z”, “sh”, “zh” plus a consonant, as well as with the consonant “ш”. The preposition “so” is used with words starting with “l”, “l”, “r”, “m”, “v” plus a consonant: from the forehead, with ice, with the mouth, with me, with everyone.

That is why you should write “with a star”, “with mutual”, but “with a hat”, “from the day”. Moreover, it is interesting that “from the day” is written only if we are talking about a specific day, and not about the day as the starting point for counting time. For example: birthday photos (taken at a birthday party). But: photos are stored from the day of birth (and until now).
Prepositions “to” and “to”. As in the previous case, the preposition “ko” is combined with words starting with “l”, “l”, “m”, “r” plus a consonant: to the forehead, to the ice, to me, to the mouth. Used with words that are respectively in the dative case: all, every, every, Tuesday, second.

The prepositions “in” and “in”. Similarly: we write “vo” with words starting with the letters “l”, “l”, “m”, “r” plus a consonant. The preposition “in” is also combined with words ending in “v”, “f” plus a consonant: in power, in Florence, but: in form, in Feodosia. And it is placed before the form “what”: into what.

And you also need to remember that if you need to use such prepositions before numbers (if they are not written in words), then the additional letter “o” is not placed in the prepositions.

For example: with 100 rubles (with one hundred rubles), in the second quarter (in the second quarter).

Obviously, we cannot give all the rules here, but if at least these are remembered, there is a high probability that your “solo performance” will be an encore. In any case, we sincerely wish you this!

Now let’s move on to our fun excerpts from articles where not all the “notes” were hit.

— You should not blatantly repeat a competitor’s product.

“Insolently” is an adverb and is written together, but not as a preposition with the noun “insolently.” Otherwise, it turns out like in the joke: Stirlitz shot at the blind. The blind woman fell.

- Same thing, by the way...

To become here also has nothing to do with it, and “too” is an adverb and is written together, just like “by the way”: “Also, by the way...”.

— I say that experience tells me about negative developments.

Let's return to the beginning of our “musical piece”, that is, the article. Experience suggests - what? - negative development of events. Experience says - what? - about negative developments of events.

— You begin to complain to all your friends and colleagues about your unhappy fate and what you think is a “abnormal” leader.

You can complain about something, someone or somewhere. The phrase “as it seems to you” should be isolated. We get: “You begin to complain to all your friends and colleagues about your (better “your”) unhappy fate and about the “abnormal” leader, as you think.” Or like this: “You begin to tell all your friends and colleagues about your unhappy fate and about the “abnormal” leader, as it seems to you.”

— Warned about the need to undergo a course of treatment.

Warned about the need - what? - undergoing a course of treatment. The use of the preposition “in” would be appropriate in the sentence: “There is a need to undergo a course of treatment.”

— The following stages of approval are almost identical to other stages.

Identical to what? (to whom?) (and not with what!) - to other stages.

— The manager sits in the middle of the table.

It would seem that one should write “sitting at the table,” otherwise the imagination draws exactly what you see in the picture. But “sitting in the middle of the table” is not a false note at all, because the middle is a place more or less equally distant from the edges, the ends of something, in this case from the ends of the table, unless, of course, it is round.

— If you are in awe of an actor...

You can be in awe of someone or something: “If you are in awe of an actor...”.

— Do you follow your competitors?

This even happens... Sorry, we caught you! Did you write it in a hurry? Is everything clear? But a person is not obliged to read between the lines, even if he is quick-witted. What if you say the phrase out loud? It's harder to guess. What if you rearrange the words in the song? I wonder what will happen? So, let’s put everything in its place: we move the pronoun “you” to the beginning of the sentence, where it should be. We get: “Are you monitoring your competitors?” The question can be rephrased differently: “Are you keeping an eye on your competitors?” - that is, we not only rearrange the preposition and pronoun, but also add the particle “li”.

And here’s another from the same opera, oddly enough:

- They sued you for this.
The prepositions are just rearranged, but how the meaning changes! Someone sued you for something, but you seem to have nothing to do with it. It turns out, no: “They sued you for this.”

- No more than two people should sound at the same time.

Even though we have a musical orientation today, we do not accept such an expression. A person is not a musical instrument, what can a person sound like? He can speak or sing, but only his voice will sound, and not the person himself.

And in conclusion... the last chord. We advise you to remember the spelling of derivative prepositions: “during”, “in continuation”, “to avoid”, “in contrast”, “in conclusion”, “in conclusion” - they are written separately and have the letter “e” at the end, except for the prepositions “ in relation to" (with the letter "and") and "as a result" (combined).

There are prepositions in Russian V/VO, S/SO, O/OB. Each of these pairs of prepositions has the same meaning with a slight difference, adding the vowel letter “O” for ease of pronouncing the words. Let's look at examples of when it is necessary to use a specific preposition.

Prepositions В or ВО

If a word after a preposition begins with two consonants, the first of which is V or F, then the preposition VO is used in speech and writing:

In fr agmente, in fr aze, in France ances, in fr Ansuzian, in fl Akone

There is a very interesting quote in a fragment of this film. – – There is a very interesting quote in the fragment of this film.

At the French restaurant we tried the new summer menu. – – We tasted a new summer menu in the French restaurant.

On Tue orom, on Tue ornik, in HF let's make a fuss, in the air I see in ow adenia, on Sun yak

His car was in the second row on the road. – – His car was in the second row on the road.

I found my interview in yesterday's magazine. – – I found my interview in yesterday’s magazine.

The preposition VO is also used with the following words:

In many wow, in many wow, in in yes, in and me

They took a full-length photo with a smartphone. – – They took photos on the smartphone in all their height.

This book is very popular and is published in many countries around the world. – – This book is very popular and published in many countries of the world.

Prepositions C or CO

The principle of use is the same as in the previous pair of prepositions. The letter O is added to the preposition C if the preposition is used with a word that begins with two consonants.

From the chair, with me, with tears, with everyone, with many

Take your toy from the chair! – – Take your toy from the chair.

Who will go to the river with me today? – – Who will come to the river with me?

Prepositions O or OB

In the case of the preposition O, the letter B is added if the preposition comes before a word that begins with the vowels A, I, O, U, E.

About these about toys, about Arine, about lesson, about encyclopedias.

I've heard a lot about these people. – – I’ve heard a lot about these people.

Jason called his friends in the UK and told them about Russian language lessons. – – Jason called to his friends in Great Britain and told about his Russian language lessons.

In addition, with some words starting with a consonant, the preposition OBO is used:

About everyone, about to me

I can talk to you about everything in the world! – – It’s possible to talk about everything in the world with you!

Don't ask anything about me! – – Don’t ask anything about me!

Exceptions:

Your new story is about you? – – Is your story about you?